The biggest barrier to adopting AI in healthcare isn't model capability — it's safety. How do you use powerful LLMs like Grok or GPT-4 on sensitive patient records without risking a HIPAA violation?

The answer isn't to avoid AI, but to wrap it in a Security Cage.

The Problem

Every healthcare CIO faces the same dilemma: AI models need data to be useful, but the data they need — Social Security numbers, medical record numbers, diagnoses, lab results — is exactly the data that regulations demand you protect. Traditional approaches force a choice: use AI and accept the risk, or stay compliant and stay manual.

AKIOS eliminates that trade-off.

The Regulatory Landscape

Healthcare AI in the United States must comply with multiple overlapping frameworks:

RegulationScopeHow AKIOS Enforces It
HIPAA / HITECH Strict rules on Protected Health Information (PHI) storage, transmission, and access In-memory redaction at ingestion. The AI never sees raw patient identifiers.
21 CFR Part 11 FDA requirements for electronic records and electronic signatures Merkle-chained audit trail with cryptographic signatures satisfies e-signature requirements.
EU AI Act (High-Risk) AI systems in healthcare classified as high-risk, requiring conformity assessments Full audit trails and human-in-the-loop controls satisfy high-risk AI requirements.
HITECH Breach Notification Mandatory breach notification within 60 days if PHI is exposed Zero-exposure architecture — PHI is redacted before AI processing, so there is nothing to breach.
State Privacy Laws California CCPA, Texas HB 300, New York SHIELD Act — state-level health data protections Policy templates per jurisdiction ensure the cage enforces the strictest applicable rules.

AKIOS enforces these at the runtime level — not as a checklist, but as code.

The Concept: Policy as Code

AKIOS introduces the concept of a "Security Cage" — an ephemeral, sandboxed runtime environment where data is processed under strict, code-defined policies. Unlike traditional compliance built on documentation and trust, the Security Cage makes violations physically impossible at the infrastructure level.

The Workflow: Automated PHI Redaction

StepWhat HappensSecurity Control
1. Ingestion Raw patient admission record (SSN, Name, Address, MRN) loaded into the cage Data enters via read-only filesystem agent. No copies outside the cage.
2. Redaction 50+ PHI patterns detected and masked before AI processing SSN, MRN, NPI, DOB replaced with tokens. The original never reaches the LLM.
3. AI Analysis LLM performs clinical analysis on redacted content — coding, summarization, risk flags Budget capped ($1.00/record), network isolated, no persistent storage.
4. Integration Sanitized output deployed to whitelisted EHR API (Epic/Cerner via FHIR/HL7) HTTP agent locked to approved FHIR endpoints only. No other destinations allowed.
5. Audit Every byte read, written, and transmitted logged with cryptographic hash Merkle chain — if any entry is altered, the entire chain is invalidated.

Architecture

graph LR
    EHR["EHR System\n(Epic/Cerner)"] -->|"patient records\n(encrypted)"| FS["filesystem agent\nread-only"]

    subgraph CAGE["AKIOS Security Cage"]
        FS --> PII["Redaction Engine\n«SSN» «NPI» «MRN» «DOB»"]
        PII --> LLM["llm agent\nclinical analysis"]
        LLM --> TE["tool_executor\ncoding & classification"]
        TE --> VALID["Output Validation\nraw data check"]
        VALID --> MERKLE["Merkle Chain\nSHA-256 signed"]
        MERKLE --> COST["Cost Kill-Switch\n$1.00 / record"]
    end

    COST -->|"coded output\n(redacted)"| HTTP["http agent\nFHIR endpoint only"]
    HTTP --> EHR
    MERKLE -->|"audit export\n(immutable)"| CISO["Compliance Officer"]
    CISO --> HHS["HHS / OCR\nAuditor"]

Policy Configuration

The entire compliance posture is defined in a single YAML file:

# healthcare-hipaa-policy.yml
security:
  sandbox: strict
  network: isolated
  allowed_endpoints:
    - ehr-fhir.internal:443
  pii_redaction:
    enabled: true
    patterns: [ssn, mrn, npi, dob, phone, address, insurance_id]
    mode: aggressive
  budget:
    max_cost_per_run: 1.00
    currency: USD
  audit:
    merkle_chain: true
    export_format: jsonl
    retention_days: 2190  # 6 years — HIPAA retention requirement

What the Compliance Officer Sees

At the end of the workflow, the compliance team receives a structured report:

FieldValue
Recordadmission-2026-0206-****4281.pdf
Clinical CodeICD-10: E11.9 — Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications
Risk FlagsDrug interaction alert — metformin + contrast dye imaging scheduled
Confidence94%
Audit Hashb4a7c1...d82f
PHI Exposed❌ None — all identifiers redacted before analysis
FHIR Submission✅ Coded output submitted to Epic FHIR R4 endpoint

No SSNs. No patient names. No raw medical records. Just clinically actionable output with a cryptographic proof chain.

Why It Matters

  • Zero PHI Exposure: Patient identifiers are redacted before any AI processing. Even if the model is compromised, there is nothing to leak.
  • Auditable Decisions: Every clinical code and risk flag includes a cryptographic proof chain. HHS/OCR auditors can trace exactly how a decision was made.
  • Cost Control: Hard budget limits per record prevent runaway API bills — critical when processing thousands of patient admissions.
  • HIPAA Retention: Merkle chain logs are exportable in JSONL format, satisfying the 6-year HIPAA retention requirement.
  • EU AI Act Ready: Full audit trails and human-in-the-loop controls satisfy high-risk AI classification requirements.

Try It Yourself

AKIOS is open-source. You can run this exact workflow today:

pip install akios
akios init my-project
akios run templates/file_analysis.yml

Secure your AI. Build with AKIOS.