Pharmaceutical companies spend an average of $2.6 billion and 10–15 years to bring a single drug to market. AI can compress that timeline — analyzing trial data, identifying adverse events, and optimizing patient cohorts. The problem: clinical trial data contains the most sensitive health information imaginable, and the FDA demands complete reproducibility.
AKIOS solves this with the Security Cage: an ephemeral, sandboxed runtime where AI processes trial data under strict, code-defined policies.
The Problem
Clinical trials generate enormous datasets: adverse event reports, lab results, patient-reported outcomes, imaging data. Human reviewers take weeks to identify safety signals that AI can spot in minutes. But connecting AI to trial data creates a fundamental tension: the FDA requires complete reproducibility and auditability for every analysis, while privacy regulations demand that patient identifiers never be exposed.
AKIOS gives you AI-powered signal detection with FDA-grade auditability and zero patient data exposure.
The Regulatory Landscape
Pharma in the US operates under a tightly interlocking regulatory stack:
| Regulation | Scope | How AKIOS Enforces It |
|---|---|---|
| 21 CFR Part 11 | FDA requirements for electronic records and signatures — AI outputs must be attributable, auditable, tamper-evident | Merkle-chained audit trail with cryptographic signatures satisfies e-signature and e-record requirements. |
| HIPAA | Trial participant data is PHI — AI models cannot retain, memorize, or leak individual participant info | Patient identifiers stripped before AI processing. Ephemeral cage destroyed after each run. |
| ICH E6(R2) / GCP | Good Clinical Practice — data integrity, participant confidentiality, investigator oversight of automated analyses | Deterministic sandbox ensures reproducible analysis. Human-in-the-loop for all safety signals. |
| FDA AI/ML Guidance | Evolving framework for AI in drug development — transparency, validation, human-in-the-loop decisions | Complete inference chain exported per analysis. Every signal includes its statistical basis. |
| GDPR (EU Trials) | Multi-site trials involving EU participants must comply with GDPR data minimization | All PII redacted before processing. Data never leaves the cage. Cross-border transfer impossible. |
AKIOS enforces these at the runtime level — the AI agent never operates outside the compliance boundary.
The Concept: Policy as Code
AKIOS introduces the concept of a "Security Cage" — an ephemeral, sandboxed runtime environment where data is processed under strict, code-defined policies. For pharma, the key feature is deterministic reproducibility: the same dataset processed in the same cage always produces the identical output, satisfying FDA requirements for analysis validation.
The Workflow: Clinical Trial Data Analysis
| Step | What Happens | Security Control |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Ingestion | Trial data (adverse events, lab results, patient outcomes) loaded into the cage | Patient identifiers, site codes, and investigator details redacted before AI sees them. |
| 2. De-identification | Subject IDs, site numbers, and investigator names replaced with tokens | 50+ identifier patterns stripped. The LLM sees only de-identified clinical data. |
| 3. AI Analysis | LLM reviews trial data for safety signals — AE clustering, unexpected lab patterns, efficacy trends | Budget capped ($1.00/analysis), network isolated, no data persistence. |
| 4. Reporting | Findings structured as regulatory-ready reports with confidence intervals and statistical methods | AI cannot modify trial records. Output is read-only with human review gate. |
| 5. Audit | Every inference, data access, and output cryptographically signed with 21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures | FDA auditors can verify the complete analysis path for any submission. |
Architecture
graph LR
CTMS["Clinical Trial\nDatabase (EDC)"] -->|"subject data\n(encrypted)"| FS["filesystem agent\nread-only"]
subgraph CAGE["AKIOS Security Cage"]
FS --> PII["De-identification Engine\n«SUBJECT_ID» «SITE» «PI_NAME»"]
PII --> LLM["llm agent\nsafety signal detection"]
LLM --> TE["tool_executor\nstatistical validation"]
TE --> VALID["Output Validation\nno raw patient data"]
VALID --> MERKLE["Merkle Chain\n21 CFR Part 11 signed"]
MERKLE --> COST["Cost Kill-Switch\n$1.00 / analysis"]
end
COST -->|"safety report\n(de-identified)"| Report["Regulatory\nSubmission"]
Report --> Medical["Medical Officer\n/ Safety Board"]
MERKLE -->|"audit export\n(immutable)"| QA["Regulatory Affairs"]
QA --> FDA["FDA / EMA\nInspection"]
Policy Configuration
The entire compliance posture is defined in a single YAML file:
# pharma-clinical-trial-policy.yml
security:
sandbox: strict
network: isolated
allowed_endpoints: [] # zero network access
pii_redaction:
enabled: true
patterns: [subject_id, site_code, investigator_name, ssn, dob, mrn]
mode: aggressive
budget:
max_cost_per_run: 1.00
currency: USD
audit:
merkle_chain: true
export_format: jsonl
retention_days: 5475 # 15 years — FDA clinical trial retention
cfr_part_11: true # electronic signature compliance
constraints:
deterministic: true # same input always produces same output
trial_record_modification: disabled
What the Medical Officer Sees
At the end of the workflow, the medical safety board receives a structured report:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Analysis ID | TRIAL-2026-0210-****4829 |
| Safety Signal | 🔴 Hepatotoxicity cluster — 4 Grade 3 ALT elevations in Treatment Arm B (expected: <1) |
| Statistical Basis | Fisher's exact test p=0.003, RR=4.2 (95% CI: 1.4–12.8) vs placebo |
| MedDRA Code | 10019670 — Hepatocellular injury |
| Recommended Action | DSMB review recommended — potential dose modification for Arm B |
| Confidence | 93% |
| Audit Hash | a4d7e2...f81c |
| Patient Data Exposed | ❌ None — all subject identifiers de-identified before analysis |
No patient names. No site identifiers. No investigator details. Just clinically actionable safety intelligence with an FDA-grade audit chain.
Why It Matters
- Zero Data Leakage: Patient identifiers are stripped before any AI processing. The model never sees who a patient is — only de-identified clinical outcomes.
- 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance: Every AI output includes electronic signatures and is stored in tamper-evident audit logs that satisfy FDA inspection requirements.
- Reproducible Analysis: The Security Cage's deterministic runtime means any analysis can be exactly reproduced months or years later for an FDA audit.
- Accelerated Timelines: AI can scan thousands of adverse event reports in minutes, flagging safety signals that would take human reviewers weeks to identify.
- Multi-Site Trial Support: De-identification ensures GDPR compliance for EU trial sites. Data sovereignty is enforced by infrastructure, not policy.
Try It Yourself
pip install akios
akios init my-project
akios run templates/file_analysis.yml
Secure your AI. Build with AKIOS.