Pharmaceutical companies spend an average of $2.6 billion and 10–15 years to bring a single drug to market. AI can compress that timeline — analyzing trial data, identifying adverse events, and optimizing patient cohorts. The problem: clinical trial data contains the most sensitive health information imaginable, and the FDA demands complete reproducibility.

AKIOS solves this with the Security Cage: an ephemeral, sandboxed runtime where AI processes trial data under strict, code-defined policies.

The Problem

Clinical trials generate enormous datasets: adverse event reports, lab results, patient-reported outcomes, imaging data. Human reviewers take weeks to identify safety signals that AI can spot in minutes. But connecting AI to trial data creates a fundamental tension: the FDA requires complete reproducibility and auditability for every analysis, while privacy regulations demand that patient identifiers never be exposed.

AKIOS gives you AI-powered signal detection with FDA-grade auditability and zero patient data exposure.

The Regulatory Landscape

Pharma in the US operates under a tightly interlocking regulatory stack:

RegulationScopeHow AKIOS Enforces It
21 CFR Part 11 FDA requirements for electronic records and signatures — AI outputs must be attributable, auditable, tamper-evident Merkle-chained audit trail with cryptographic signatures satisfies e-signature and e-record requirements.
HIPAA Trial participant data is PHI — AI models cannot retain, memorize, or leak individual participant info Patient identifiers stripped before AI processing. Ephemeral cage destroyed after each run.
ICH E6(R2) / GCP Good Clinical Practice — data integrity, participant confidentiality, investigator oversight of automated analyses Deterministic sandbox ensures reproducible analysis. Human-in-the-loop for all safety signals.
FDA AI/ML Guidance Evolving framework for AI in drug development — transparency, validation, human-in-the-loop decisions Complete inference chain exported per analysis. Every signal includes its statistical basis.
GDPR (EU Trials) Multi-site trials involving EU participants must comply with GDPR data minimization All PII redacted before processing. Data never leaves the cage. Cross-border transfer impossible.

AKIOS enforces these at the runtime level — the AI agent never operates outside the compliance boundary.

The Concept: Policy as Code

AKIOS introduces the concept of a "Security Cage" — an ephemeral, sandboxed runtime environment where data is processed under strict, code-defined policies. For pharma, the key feature is deterministic reproducibility: the same dataset processed in the same cage always produces the identical output, satisfying FDA requirements for analysis validation.

The Workflow: Clinical Trial Data Analysis

StepWhat HappensSecurity Control
1. Ingestion Trial data (adverse events, lab results, patient outcomes) loaded into the cage Patient identifiers, site codes, and investigator details redacted before AI sees them.
2. De-identification Subject IDs, site numbers, and investigator names replaced with tokens 50+ identifier patterns stripped. The LLM sees only de-identified clinical data.
3. AI Analysis LLM reviews trial data for safety signals — AE clustering, unexpected lab patterns, efficacy trends Budget capped ($1.00/analysis), network isolated, no data persistence.
4. Reporting Findings structured as regulatory-ready reports with confidence intervals and statistical methods AI cannot modify trial records. Output is read-only with human review gate.
5. Audit Every inference, data access, and output cryptographically signed with 21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures FDA auditors can verify the complete analysis path for any submission.

Architecture

graph LR
    CTMS["Clinical Trial\nDatabase (EDC)"] -->|"subject data\n(encrypted)"| FS["filesystem agent\nread-only"]

    subgraph CAGE["AKIOS Security Cage"]
        FS --> PII["De-identification Engine\n«SUBJECT_ID» «SITE» «PI_NAME»"]
        PII --> LLM["llm agent\nsafety signal detection"]
        LLM --> TE["tool_executor\nstatistical validation"]
        TE --> VALID["Output Validation\nno raw patient data"]
        VALID --> MERKLE["Merkle Chain\n21 CFR Part 11 signed"]
        MERKLE --> COST["Cost Kill-Switch\n$1.00 / analysis"]
    end

    COST -->|"safety report\n(de-identified)"| Report["Regulatory\nSubmission"]
    Report --> Medical["Medical Officer\n/ Safety Board"]
    MERKLE -->|"audit export\n(immutable)"| QA["Regulatory Affairs"]
    QA --> FDA["FDA / EMA\nInspection"]

Policy Configuration

The entire compliance posture is defined in a single YAML file:

# pharma-clinical-trial-policy.yml
security:
  sandbox: strict
  network: isolated
  allowed_endpoints: []  # zero network access
  pii_redaction:
    enabled: true
    patterns: [subject_id, site_code, investigator_name, ssn, dob, mrn]
    mode: aggressive
  budget:
    max_cost_per_run: 1.00
    currency: USD
  audit:
    merkle_chain: true
    export_format: jsonl
    retention_days: 5475  # 15 years — FDA clinical trial retention
    cfr_part_11: true  # electronic signature compliance
  constraints:
    deterministic: true  # same input always produces same output
    trial_record_modification: disabled

What the Medical Officer Sees

At the end of the workflow, the medical safety board receives a structured report:

FieldValue
Analysis IDTRIAL-2026-0210-****4829
Safety Signal🔴 Hepatotoxicity cluster — 4 Grade 3 ALT elevations in Treatment Arm B (expected: <1)
Statistical BasisFisher's exact test p=0.003, RR=4.2 (95% CI: 1.4–12.8) vs placebo
MedDRA Code10019670 — Hepatocellular injury
Recommended ActionDSMB review recommended — potential dose modification for Arm B
Confidence93%
Audit Hasha4d7e2...f81c
Patient Data Exposed❌ None — all subject identifiers de-identified before analysis

No patient names. No site identifiers. No investigator details. Just clinically actionable safety intelligence with an FDA-grade audit chain.

Why It Matters

  • Zero Data Leakage: Patient identifiers are stripped before any AI processing. The model never sees who a patient is — only de-identified clinical outcomes.
  • 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance: Every AI output includes electronic signatures and is stored in tamper-evident audit logs that satisfy FDA inspection requirements.
  • Reproducible Analysis: The Security Cage's deterministic runtime means any analysis can be exactly reproduced months or years later for an FDA audit.
  • Accelerated Timelines: AI can scan thousands of adverse event reports in minutes, flagging safety signals that would take human reviewers weeks to identify.
  • Multi-Site Trial Support: De-identification ensures GDPR compliance for EU trial sites. Data sovereignty is enforced by infrastructure, not policy.

Try It Yourself

pip install akios
akios init my-project
akios run templates/file_analysis.yml

Secure your AI. Build with AKIOS.